I told myself I wasn’t going to watch OJ’s robbery trial.  But, being the CourtTV fan I am, along with the fact that I was overwhelmingly drawn to this drama, I’ve started watching from the beginning of the opening statements.

The prosecution had me at hello.  But then, after hearing the defense’s opening, I’m now hooked on this trial!  Seriously, the defense’s theory sounded almost legit and plausible, didn’t it?  I seriously thought it was all about memorabilia and money – didn’t you?

Were those items just OJ’s personal items – mementos?  What if?  And, what about the phone call OJ makes directly after this alleged robbery?  He talks about not knowing about any gun.  What’s up with that?

I’ve got my DVR set to record Lisa Bloom, Jami Floyd and Banfield & Ford daily so I can watch them later (without all the commercials).  What’s really great is that you can watch Trials on Demand – so if you miss anything, you can catch-up.

So, tell me what you think so far?  Are you with the prosecution or defense?

Related Posts

• None Yet.